Agent context platforms
Ingest documents, conversations, tickets, meetings, CRM records, support history, files, and web signal into an AI-ready context layer.

Senior architecture and implementation help for teams building agents, copilots, and context-aware AI products.
Graphlit helps software teams get from AI prototype to production with the right context architecture, ingestion strategy, tool-calling design, evaluation plan, and runtime foundation.
The hard part
If you are building agents, copilots, AI workflows, or context-aware product features, the hardest questions usually are not inside the model. They are around it.
What data should the AI access? How does it stay fresh? Which facts are current? Where did the answer come from? Which tools should the agent use? What should be built now, and what should stay disposable until you learn more?
We help founders and product teams answer those questions early, so they can move faster without painting themselves into a corner.
What we help teams build
Ingest documents, conversations, tickets, meetings, CRM records, support history, files, and web signal into an AI-ready context layer.
Build search, chat, browsing, and retrieval experiences over private company or personal knowledge across the tools people already use.
Create domain-specific agents for deal intelligence, customer intelligence, support intelligence, research, sales, operations, or compliance.
Expose context to Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, Claude, internal agents, and custom clients through Model Context Protocol patterns.
Resolve entities, gather facts, evaluate gaps, deepen research, synthesize findings, cite sources, and verify the result before delivery.
Let agents draft email, write documents, post to channels, create tickets, schedule meetings, and append notes with explicit trust boundaries.
Design scheduled agents, triggered agents, webhooks, heartbeat checks, workers, retries, side-effect budgets, observability, and return-to-thread delivery.
Extract entities, facts, relationships, timelines, source provenance, external signal, and enrichment data from messy operational context.
From architecture to production
We help teams design the intelligence layer around real workflows: multi-step reasoning, context engineering, tool calling, exception handling, evaluation, feedback loops, governance, and cost control.
The work runs in two registers. With product and operations leaders, we map how work actually happens. With engineering, we turn that into buildable agent specs, success criteria, rollout plans, and implementation decisions.
Map how the product or workflow actually moves across users, systems, data, decision points, and failure modes. Identify where agents can help, where simpler automation is enough, and where time, money, or quality is leaking today.
Translate what we find into concrete agent specifications: what the agent does, what data it touches, what success looks like, what failure modes need handling, and what the engineering team can build now.
Help your engineering team implement the ingestion layer, MCP tools, agent workflow, research engine, data model, or runtime path that gets the product from demo-grade to pilot-ready.
Monitor accuracy, surface failure modes, tighten quality, safety, groundedness, latency, cost, observability, and governance, then fold what worked back into a reusable pattern library.
Production agent architecture
We have already built these layers in Graphlit, Zine, and Dossium. Services help other software teams apply the same patterns to their own products.
Operational context tells an agent what is true. Methodology tells it how your team turns truth into work. We help teams model both.
Useful agents are not trapped in one chat box. They need to meet users in web apps, Slack, email, voice, SMS, docs, tickets, and calendars.
Reading is half the agent. Writing is the other half. We design provider-agnostic work verbs, trust tiers, draft paths, and side-effect controls.
Real research is not one search. Agents need routing, enrichment, entity resolution, evidence gathering, worker decomposition, synthesis, and verification.
Production agents need durable workflows, queues, budgets, observability, stuck detection, prompt caching, and delivery back to the surface where work began.
How we work
We use the latest coding agents, including Codex and Claude Code, in our own product work. That gives us a practical feel for hyper-fast implementation cycles, agent-assisted refactors, and the new pace of software delivery.
The point is not speed for its own sake. The point is using that speed with enough product and architecture discipline to avoid rebuilding the foundation when pilots start to matter.
Engagements
Founders and product teams with a prototype, pilot, or roadmap where the next architecture decisions feel expensive to get wrong.
Teams that need to accelerate a specific AI product milestone, customer pilot, agent workflow, or context-aware prototype.
Companies that need senior AI product and platform guidance but are not ready to hire a full-time AI architect or platform lead.
Why Graphlit
Graphlit builds the context infrastructure behind AI agents and AI-native applications: multimodal ingestion, entities, facts, relationships, source attribution, search, MCP, and agent context.
Zine and Dossium are product proof. They show how context ingestion, agentic retrieval, MCP, data enrichment, context graphs, governed write paths, and durable runtime patterns become actual user-facing products.

Common questions
Not really. Retrieval is part of the work, but production AI products need more than one vector index. We focus on the architecture around agents: ingestion, context graphs, memory, permissions, provenance, tool use, workflow triggers, evaluation, runtime, and governed action.
Yes, when the product depends on private, messy, changing context. That can mean a knowledge workspace, a vertical agent product, a research engine, a customer-intelligence system, an MCP-enabled context layer, or a durable agent workflow platform.
Graphlit is often the fastest path because it already handles multimodal ingestion, entities, facts, search, conversations, MCP, and agent context. But the engagement starts with the product and architecture problem, not a forced tool choice.
Yes. The strongest fit is helping internal teams make architecture decisions, unblock implementation, review designs, and accelerate the parts of the system where agent context, tool use, data flows, or runtime boundaries matter.
We use modern coding agents such as Codex and Claude Code in our own product work, and we are comfortable building with that operating model. Used well, they compress implementation cycles dramatically. The value is pairing that speed with senior architecture judgment so teams move quickly without cementing the wrong foundation.
Work with us
If your team is building an AI product, agent, copilot, or context-aware workflow, we can help you make the right architecture and implementation decisions sooner.